HLS vs DASH: Which Streaming Format is Better?

The battle of streaming protocols: Apple's HLS vs. the industry standard MPEG-DASH. We break down the differences to help you decide.

Introduction

If you're involved in video streaming, you've likely encountered two main acronyms: HLS (HTTP Live Streaming) and MPEG-DASH (Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP). Both are adaptive bitrate streaming protocols that dominate the modern web, but they have distinct histories, features, and use cases.

In this guide, we'll compare them head-to-head to help you understand which one is right for your needs in 2025.

What is HLS?

HLS (HTTP Live Streaming) was developed by Apple in 2009. It was originally designed to solve streaming issues on iPhones but has since become the most widely supported streaming protocol globally.

What is MPEG-DASH?

MPEG-DASH is an open standard developed by the Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG). Unlike HLS, which is proprietary to Apple (though widely adopted), DASH is codec-agnostic and vendor-independent.

Key Differences

Feature HLS MPEG-DASH
Developer Apple MPEG (International Standard)
Codec Support Limited (H.264/H.265) Agnostic (Supports VP9, AV1)
Container Format MPEG-2 TS (legacy), fMP4 fMP4, WebM
DRM FairPlay (Apple) Widevine (Google), PlayReady (Microsoft)
Latency Higher (typically 6-30s) Lower (can be <5s)

Pros & Cons

HLS Pros & Cons

✅ Pros

  • Native support on all Apple devices
  • Widely supported on almost all players
  • Simple infrastructure requirements

❌ Cons

  • Higher latency by default
  • Restricted codec support (mostly)

DASH Pros & Cons

✅ Pros

  • Codec agnostic (supports open codecs like AV1)
  • Lower latency options
  • International standard

❌ Cons

  • No native support on iOS/Safari
  • More complex to configure

Device Compatibility

This is often the deciding factor.

Critical Note: If your audience uses iPhones, you MUST have an HLS stream. iOS Safari does not support DASH.

The Verdict: Which to Choose?

So, which one wins?

Choose HLS if:

Choose DASH if:

The Hybrid Approach: Many premium streaming services (like Netflix and YouTube) use both. They serve HLS to Apple devices and DASH to everything else. However, for most smaller projects, HLS is the safer, one-size-fits-all choice.

References

  1. Apple Inc. (2017). HTTP Live Streaming (HLS) - RFC 8216. IETF. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8216
  2. ISO/IEC (2014). Information technology — Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH) — Part 1: Media presentation description and segment formats. ISO/IEC 23009-1:2014.
  3. Stockhammer, T. (2011). Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP: Standards and Design Principles. Proceedings of the second annual ACM conference on Multimedia systems.
  4. Wiegand, T., Sullivan, G. J., Bjontegaard, G., & Luthra, A. (2003). Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, 13(7), 560-576.
  5. Mozilla Developer Network. (2024). Media Source Extensions API. MDN Web Docs